United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have been instructed to stop arresting immigrants who do not have criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, according to agency sources. Under the reported directive, federal immigration agents may arrest immigrants with criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, while those with final deportation orders but no criminal convictions or charges would not be arrested, The Daily Wire reported. The reported change would also end so-called “collateral arrests,” under which officers may detain others without legal status encountered while pursuing a criminal target, according to sources. Read: US judge blocks Trump limits on how long foreign students, journalists can stay The reported directive comes amid increased scrutiny of the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement policies and ICE operations. Several ICE officers expressed frustration about the reported change, with one...
Authorities in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh have imposed a ban on offering Eid ul Fitr prayers on roads, a move that has drawn widespread criticism from opposition leaders, civil society, and even members of the ruling party's coalition. Meerut city’s Superintendent of Police, Ayush Vikram Singh, announced the ban, warning that anyone who offers prayers on the roads will face strict legal action. The penalties include the possible cancellation of passports and driving licences. "Under no circumstances shall namaz be offered on the road," Singh said in a statement. This directive has triggered backlash from various quarters, with critics accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government of discriminating against Muslims ahead of Eid. Samajwadi Party MP Iqra Hasan questioned the government's motives, asking, “Why is the government so troubled by a 10-minute Eid prayer?” The ban has also provoked reactions from BJP allies. Chirag Paswan, a key ally in Prime Minister Modi’s government, condemned the ban, saying, “I do not agree with this politics. We should be focusing on bigger issues, not on Hindu and Muslim divisions.” Another BJP ally, Union Minister Chaudhary Jayant Singh, labelled the police action “authoritarian”, drawing comparisons to George Orwell's 1984. The controversy escalated following similar restrictions in Sambhal, where officials attempted to ban prayers even on rooftops. However, after facing significant public criticism, the district magistrate clarified that the ban applied only to certain dilapidated rooftops. Despite the controversy, police deployed drone cameras and CCTVs to monitor compliance with the directive during Friday prayers. Congregational prayers are permitted only inside mosques and designated Eidgahs, with peace committee members tasked with redirecting worshippers when mosques reach 70-80% capacity. Opposition figures, including Samajwadi Party MP Ziaur Rehman Barq, have condemned the restrictions. "If a person is not allowed to pray at his residence, where will he go?" Barq asked. Meanwhile, Chandra Shekhar Aazad, an opposition MP from Bijnor, criticised the UP police’s actions, stating, “The police are not the court. They do not have any right to cancel passports.” The controversy has raised concerns over religious freedoms and the growing scope of government overreach in India, with many accusing the authorities of targeting Muslims under the guise of maintaining law and order.
from Latest World News, International News | Breaking World News https://ift.tt/NsCReyd
from Latest World News, International News | Breaking World News https://ift.tt/NsCReyd
Comments
Post a Comment