United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have been instructed to stop arresting immigrants who do not have criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, according to agency sources. Under the reported directive, federal immigration agents may arrest immigrants with criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, while those with final deportation orders but no criminal convictions or charges would not be arrested, The Daily Wire reported. The reported change would also end so-called “collateral arrests,” under which officers may detain others without legal status encountered while pursuing a criminal target, according to sources. Read: US judge blocks Trump limits on how long foreign students, journalists can stay The reported directive comes amid increased scrutiny of the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement policies and ICE operations. Several ICE officers expressed frustration about the reported change, with one...
US President Donald Trump has raised a legal challenge against Formar US President Joe Biden’s use of the autopen to sign pardons for several individuals involved in the investigation of the January 6th insurrection. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump declared that Biden’s pardons were "void, vacant, and of no further force or effect" due to the use of the autopen, signaling that his administration may attempt to challenge over a century of presidential pardon practices. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Truth Social (@truthsocialclub) Trump’s comments, made just after midnight on Monday, follow similar claims from the Heritage Foundation, which has questioned the validity of several pardons signed by Biden, suggesting that the autopen’s use raised concerns about whether Biden personally approved the actions. However, Trump did not provide any evidence to support these claims. Presidential pardons and autopen controversy The presidential pardon power is one of the most absolute powers granted to the US president, and courts have traditionally been reluctant to impose limits on it. While Trump acknowledged that courts would ultimately decide the validity of the pardons, his remarks opened the door to potential legal action, including the possibility of the Justice Department pursuing charges against Biden’s political adversaries. These adversaries, such as former congresswoman Liz Cheney, retired general Mark Milley, and infectious diseases expert Anthony Fauci, were granted pardons on the final day of Biden’s presidency. Trump had previously hinted during his campaign that he might seek to prosecute these individuals. He also speculated that Biden was unaware of the pardons being signed, stating, "I’m sure Biden didn’t have any idea that it was taking place, and somebody was using an autopen to sign off and give pardons." A 2024 federal appeals court decision ruled that a pardon does not necessarily need to be in writing, noting that the Constitution imposes no limit on how a pardon is granted. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that the language of the Constitution does not require written documentation for executive clemency. A 1929 Justice Department opinion similarly emphasised that the method by which pardons are granted is entirely at the president’s discretion. This opinion was cited by the George W. Bush administration when defending Bush’s use of the autopen during his presidency.
from Latest World News, International News | Breaking World News https://ift.tt/9piAXgc
from Latest World News, International News | Breaking World News https://ift.tt/9piAXgc
Comments
Post a Comment